<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>crimulus-dot-com &#187; kill ie6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crimulus.com/tag/kill-ie6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crimulus.com</link>
	<description>A blog; ineptly autobiographical</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IE6 is not yet dead, although it should be &#8230; though I wonder</title>
		<link>http://www.crimulus.com/2009/11/09/ie6-is-not-yet-dead-although-it-should-be-though-i-wonder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crimulus.com/2009/11/09/ie6-is-not-yet-dead-although-it-should-be-though-i-wonder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embeddable browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is ie6 dead yet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdated browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource hog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s not much contention that IE6 is an outdated browser and is not suited for the modern web.  If you don&#8217;t buy that just on sheer merit, there&#8217;s no point to read the rest of this article. Most informed articles addressing the issue have boiled &#8220;the reason why&#8221; down to the fact that those users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not much contention that IE6 is an outdated browser and is not suited for the modern web.  If you don&#8217;t buy that just on sheer merit, there&#8217;s no point to read the rest of this article.</p>
<p>Most informed articles addressing the issue have boiled &#8220;the reason why&#8221; down to the fact that those users can&#8217;t upgrade (restricted by work, slow computer, etc.)</p>
<p>However, I wonder how it would be to build an HTML/JavaScript browser (which is effectively what Firefox currently is) that embeds directly into IE6 by visiting a webpage.</p>
<p>A user loads IE6, sets his/her home page to &#8220;awesome-js-browser.com&#8221; and then navigates from within that page.</p>
<p>I would venture that this would more of a nuisance and a resource hog than anything, else I think Mozilla would have tried it &#8230;</p>
<p>or have they? &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crimulus.com/2009/11/09/ie6-is-not-yet-dead-although-it-should-be-though-i-wonder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

